E. (1952)

Jevons, M. P., and you may Parker, Yards. T. (1964). J. din. Highway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Real time, I., and you will Nichols, A. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A beneficial. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. wet. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you can Pidcoe, V. (1960). Science, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, M. T. (1966). In “The newest Scientific Foundation regarding Drug Yearly Opinion” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College or university off London, New Athlone Force, London. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, A. J. H., and you will Williams, R. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

The fresh parasexual course and its include in hereditary investigation

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a good d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Declaration (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and you may Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and you will Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, An effective. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you will Wilson, J. B. (1958). In the morning.3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Path. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc

Tarr, H. A good. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. A good. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, R. E. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Age. O., and you will Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., and you can Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, R. E. O., Rippon, J. Age., and you can Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.

Genetic Investigation during the Small-organisms DAVID A beneficial. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Introduction . 11. Segregation while the Proof Effortless Hereditary Handle . A great. The brand new hereditary method of biology . B. The newest identification away from segregation . 111. The foundation of Hereditary Mapping . B. The brand new sequencing out of loci into a good linkage map: multi-foundation crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Hereditary great-structure . Elizabeth. Deletion mapping . IV. Functional Hereditary Screening . A. Dominance testing . Bplementation screening . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Data during the Eukaryotic Microbes . An excellent. Standard factors . 1. dos. Tetrad research . B. Hereditary study specifically bacteria 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger or other “imperfect” fungi step 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . 10. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Data during the Prokaryotes . A great. Standard factors . step 1. Fertility models and you may conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you can co-transduction . 3. Conversion process and co-conversion cuatro. Non-choosy study .

fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Hereditary studies in particular bacteria step 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric germs . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor or other actinomycetes . 5. Most other germs C. Official mapping measures independent of recombination VII. Hereditary Investigation for the Worms A beneficial. General considerations . step one. Sort of viral genomes dos. Features from virus genes B. Hereditary quiero citas wicca data particularly viruses step one. Bacteriophages dos. Animal worms step 3. Plant worms VIII. Finishing Commentary Records .