Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution https://besthookupwebsites.org/cuckold-dating/ and you may People Behavior, 29(2), 119�126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot of connection for the human mating. Post on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186�204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Record away from Public Facts, 58(1), 49�74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A personal tech one to reduces personal wedding and psychological really-are? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.

The many benefits of confident illusions: Idealization plus the design of pleasure inside intimate dating

Kreider, R.Yards., & Industries, J. Yards. (2001). Number, timing, and you can lifetime of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Current Population Reports, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional investigation from closeness, interests, and commitment: Investigations the brand new assumptions of one’s triangular concept of love. Mental Records, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling top about creating even worse: Personal contrasting within this intimate matchmaking. Journal out-of Identity and you will Public Mindset, 87(1), 80�95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Journal away from Character and you can Public Therapy, 97(1), 74�87.

Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit knowledge of close competition

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive options: The newest changed mindset regarding relationship repairs. Progression and you may Person Decisions, 29(5), 343�349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential study out of conflict and you will accord into the upset and you may nondistressed relationship couples. Record out-of Consulting and you can Medical Therapy, 49(4), 554�567.

McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A good. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationships development on the web: What is the big interest? Record regarding Public Points, 58(1), 9�29.

Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation aim during the romantic relationships: A type of worldwide improvement and you may certain confirmation. Inside the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents throughout the examination of couple communication (pp. 32�58). New york, NY: Cambridge College or university Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-counselor thread from the contact out-of attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Concept, Look, Routine, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). This new public keeping track of program: Enhanced susceptibility so you’re able to personal cues given that an adaptive response to public exclusion. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The societal outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and intimidation (pp. 213�226). Ny, NY: Therapy Drive.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Worldwide and particular relational designs regarding the experience of societal connections. Journal from Identification and you will Public Mindset, 80(4), 613�631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can guidance trying for the intimate dating. Identification and Societal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can specific attachment representations in the adulthood: Will there be a love?. Record Out-of Public And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Good. (2001)mitment and relationships repairs elements. In J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection in person effect among spouses as the a function of the brand new similarity in their mutual feel. Personality And Public Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Results of salience off extrinsic benefits towards liking and loving. Diary off Personality and Social Mindset, 38(3), 453�460.